Households with college-bound students are facing discriminating policies when it comes to college immunization updates requiring students to receive the experimental injection before returning to school, despite the fact that the injection only has Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).
According to the Children’s Health Defense, under the FDA, the Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) defines the injection as experimental and as such, it cannot be mandated. “Under the Nuremberg Code, the foundation of ethical medicine, no one may be coerced to participate in a medical experiment. Consent of the individual is ‘absolutely essential.’” The FDA requires that any EUA product allow recipients “the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.”
Schools with exemptions to such mandates are enforcing unreasonable rules, such as weekly testing at the student’s expense, submission to daily health checks, mask requirements when inside buildings, exclusion from dining halls or areas where there are large gatherings of students, and in some instances, the requirement to attend classes online rather than in person. These students are still required to pay full tuition while receiving separate yet unequal services.
Students starting and returning to college are facing unfair ultimatums if they aren’t willing to get the experimental injection.
How are universities and colleges able to install unconstitutional policies?
Institutions are creatively interpreting data and guidance from WHO, the CDC, and the FDA to wield their messages of discrimination. Colleges are essentially leaving out essential information when convenient. Institutions who purport to teach students critical thinking skills are rejecting essential information when communicating their updated immunization policies, putting a false spin on their messages. They are also using their leverage and influence as accredited institutions to coerce students into getting the experimental injection. Take, for instance, this statement from BYU-Hawaii’s creative interpretation of EUA:
“FDA emergency use approval (EUA) is based on the same principles as full approval but requires data over a shorter period of time (two months vs. six months) and ensures that the data does not sit on someone’s desk and wait to be reviewed. EUA does not mean the vaccine is “experimental.” It means that while there is less data than is generally requested for a standard approval, there is sufficient and compelling data to demonstrate that the benefits outweigh the risks. The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines have already filed for full approval with the incredibly large amounts of data and FDA approval is expected soon. More than 140 million American have been fully vaccinated – there is more safety information about COVID-19 vaccines than any other [injection] in history.”
This statement casually dismisses the importance of data reviewal. Pfizer and Moderna have indeed filed for full FDA approval, but that does not mean they will receive it. It also doesn’t communicate the FDA’s shady history of approving unsafe injections. Furthermore, the safety data that has been shared by both Pfizer and Moderna was cherry picked and they’ve yet to release the full body of raw data, which definitely does not support the statement that “there is more safety information about [the injection] than any other [injection] in history” let alone tell the full story of adverse reactions that continue to pile in.
How do we combat coercion and manipulation?
For starters, it is important to stop being manipulatable. This means honing our critical thinking skills and getting empowered! It’s amazing how many people will put up with a lousy or intolerant doctor or institution that doesn’t offer options, informed consent or have an open mind to any other opinion. We have to remember that we are the ones in charge, and that we call the shots—not the other way around! Admins at a school are no different. They alone should not be the ones to determine policy. Student tuition pays their salaries. Scroll down for resources on how to share your thoughts and advocate for yourself.
Life 101 and Critical Thinking:
Know when you’re being marketed to with propaganda. It does not take a marketing degree to determine this. Teach your kids how to think critically and not be controlled by the narrative.
Here are some things to ask yourself to gain better discernment:
-Are you presented with both sides of an argument?
-Have you done your own research?
-Have you gotten a second opinion or alternative advice?
-Is there pressure or coercion involved? (Think: Is there a carrot being dangled?)
-Are you being given a choice?
-Whose best interest is at stake?
-Are you able to ask questions and have them respectfully answered without judgement?
-Are you being given informed consent?
-Are there more facts, information, studies that are being left out?
-Are there alternatives, side effects, other options?
-Have your personal interests and unique case been considered in the advice given?
-Is there an emotional or financial investment on the line for the person advocating their perspective?
What can you do when you don’t agree with a policy?
It is important now more than ever to speak up—but be professional and articulate. Whether you are dealing with a university who has published a discriminatory policy or a local business who is publishing propaganda about the experimental injection, don’t let anything slide by you without making a statement and sharing your perspective. Don’t get in the habit of ignoring things thinking that is the higher road. Regardless of the slant others may try to put on it, we live in a democracy and your voice is valuable. The more individuals that flood offices with well-written statements sharing their point of view and objections to discriminatory policies, the more those offices will be forced to look at the big picture. It is going to take a grassroots response to make a difference. Let your voice be heard.
Other ideas would be to only patronize institutions and businesses that don’t discriminate against medical choice. Perhaps now is a good time for college students to take a year off to travel, volunteer or pick up a trade or skill. In the meantime, universities will certainly feel the impact on their funding and may be more likely to change their tune if enough students decide to explore other opportunities.
If you see a post, email, note on the door of a business that shares inaccurate information regarding the experimental injection or promotes a discriminating policy, say something! We’ve created a Letter that you can download that includes citations to support you in addressing inaccurate information that you may receive in newsletters, newspapers, emails or see on social media. Edit it to fit your needs and use it to speak up!
Responding to college immunization policies.
The Real Immunity Team is here to help. We’ve complied a lengthy list of support resources for college students facing mandates, including:
- Open letters from physicians about the efficacy of the injection
- Letter templates for religious exemptions
- Links to legal organizations who are looking for plaintiffs and have created resources to support self-advocacy
- A list of colleges not requiring the experimental injection
- Forms requiring schools with mandates to take responsibility for informed consent and adverse injection reactions
- Links to where you can purchase your own self-testing resources
To download our free College Immunization Mandate Support Resource, click here and then click the box next to “College Immunization Mandate Support Resource” to have it sent directly to your inbox.
Learn more about HP by signing up for our free HP Resource Sheet
————————————————————————————————————-
Can college students benefit from HP? Yes they can! Learn more by reading our blog Inquiring Minds Want to Know: Your HP Questions Answered.
